Or if I would benefit from more functionality, I'd like to understand how, exactly.īetter instrument but also more robust software with the Pro version otherwise the hardware is the same for the various packages albeit a bit slower (in purpose) in measurements. If indeed you want to get a much better product, I'd recommend looking into an X-rite i1Display (ideally Pro version). The X-rite products were 1.4 and as low as 0.8! So you'll see two Spyder's (newest models) were 9.9 and 7.2 which is pretty awful. The higher the reported dE, the worse the unit preformed. If it's no good, what would people recommend instead?\ It's about 8 years old, but looks fine to me, and has been kept in its box away from sunlight. I assume the Spyder 3 can cope with the wider Adobe RGB color space, but just wanted to check. ![]() ![]() I'm not worried about knowing the exact color space of my screen (if it's actually 99% or 101% isn't going to kill me), just that I'm using it to its full potential. I have an old Spyder 3 Pro, and while it doesn't output any graphs or stats at the end, I've found it made my previous (sRGB) monitors look much nicer. I've bought a new notebook with a 100% Adobe RGB screen, and I'd like to make sure I'm getting the best out of it.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |